ELVIS HAS LEFT THE BUILDING!
How are you guys?
Who (like me) hasn't found a director yet ? Isn't that a bit sad and quite terrifying?
Ah, well. Love lots and for God's sake, someone intelligent, post!
(see? weak ending)
The artist’s will is secondary to the process he initiates from idea to completion. His willfulness may only be ego. - Sol Lewitt
"The Company Theatre's devised production for Ranga Shankara Theatre Festival 2006 "Numbers in the dark" literally held a mirror to the audience and raised a few critical questions. The brochure cites the writings of Italo Calvino, Harold Pinter, Complicite and Jeanette Winterson as inspiration, and materials for adaptation. What is the meaning and responsibility understood by a Company when they decide to employ the definition "inspired and adapted from"?
We were each given a leaf on entering the auditorium and after a successive mirror-reflection of the immobile mass of spectators as against a lone artiste born to struggle, an introductory piece followed. By the end of the 10-minute monologue, a realization struck that except for the bits irrelevant to an Indian audience, it has been a verbatim performance of the very engaging introduction of Complicite's 1999 original production 'Mnemonic'. Including the leaf. Is this how we should now start to define an ‘inspired and adapted’ theatrical piece: without the new perception a hopeful audience looks forward to; not unlike the copy-paste job that a processor allows us? Or did The Company Theatre presume that it would be playing to a gallery of immobile spectators and not much is necessary except for the spectacle? My only perception was the uncanny coincidence. Simon McBurney had staged Ionesco’s The Chairs before the production of ‘Mnemonic’ and it is mentioned in the original script. The Company Theatre has also staged The Chairs a few weeks ago in Mumbai and
We are all writers (and actors and directors) here. Each of us know about the endless hours we spend even to get a 2-minute scene on stage right. It would be wonderful if what we write inspire other artistes and lead them to create something more or different from our piece. Playwrights anyway are never paid anything here, so just the possibility of starting a creative conversation makes us happy and feed our hunger. But what do we do when a director takes all our lines and directions (basically our play) and plonk them on stage and call it an inspiration/adaptation? I think an old foggy from early 20th century (and earlier) would call it disrespect. At this age, respect is such a vile word.